Analisis Wildlife Hazard Pada Bandar Udara di Bawah Pelayanan Informasi Aeronautika Wilayah Jakarta

Menganalisis penerapan Safety Risk Management (SRM) serta prosedur
mitigasi terhadap wildlife hazard pada bandar udara di bawah Pelayanan Informasi
Aeronautika (PIA) Wilayah Jakarta, dengan fokus pada Bandar Udara Radin Inten
II dan Bandar Udara Supadio. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah
pendekatan kualitatif melalui observasi langsung, wawancara, dan studi
dokumentasi dengan personel yang terlibat dalam kegiatan pengendalian bahaya
hewan liar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua bandara telah melakukan
langkah-langkah identifikasi bahaya serta penanganan operasional melalui patroli
rutin, pengusiran manual, dan penerbitan NOTAM. Di sisi lain, Bandara Supadio
juga menerapkan strategi pengelolaan lingkungan seperti penutupan saluran air
terbuka dan pengaturan pintu air untuk mengurangi daya tarik burung. Meskipun
demikian, efektivitas penerapan SRM masih menghadapi beberapa kendala, seperti
keterbatasan peralatan pendukung, keterbatasan anggaran, dan belum terbentuknya
unit khusus yang menangani wildlife hazard secara terfokus. Selain itu, metode
pengusiran mengalami penurunan karena hewan liar dapat beradaptasi terhadap
pola pengendalian yang digunakan. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan penguatan melalui
pembentukan unit khusus, peningkatan peralatan pendukung, serta evaluasi rutin
agar pengendalian wildlife hazard dapat berjalan secara optimal dan berkelanjutan.

Kata Kunci: Bahaya hewan liar, Manajemen Risiko Keselamatan, Mitigasi

Analyzes of implementing Safety Risk Management (SRM) and mitigation
procedures against wildlife hazards at airports under the Aeronautical Information
Services (PIA) Jakarta Region, focusing specifically on Radin Inten II Airport and
Supadio Airport. The research employs a qualitative approach through direct
observation, interviews, and documentation studies involving personnel engaged in
wildlife hazard control activities. The findings indicate that both airports have
conducted hazard identification and operational handling through routine patrols,
manual dispersal, and the issuance of NOTAMs. Additionally, Supadio Airport has
implemented environmental management strategies such as the closure of open
drainage channels and water gate regulation to reduce bird attractants. However,
the effectiveness of SRM implementation still faces several challenges, including
limited supporting equipment, budget constraints, and the absence of a dedicated
unit focused solely on wildlife hazard management. Moreover, the dispersal
methods has declined due to wildlife adaptation to established control patterns.
Therefore, strengthening efforts through the establishment of a specialized unit,
enhancement of support equipment, and regular evaluations are necessary to
ensure optimal and sustainable wildlife hazard control.

Keywords: Wildlife Hazard, Safety Risk Management (SRM), Mitigation