ANALISIS PENGAWASAN PELAKSANAAN WET DRILL DAN DRY DRILL PERSONEL PKP-PK DALAM MENINGKATKAN KESIAPSIAGAAN OPERASIONAL DI BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL YOGYAKARTA

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis prosedur pengawasan pelaksanaan wet drill dan dry drill personel Pertolongan Kecelakaan Penerbangan dan Pemadam Kebakaran (PKP-PK) dalam mendukung kesiapsiagaan operasional di Bandar Udara Internasional Yogyakarta serta merumuskan rekomendasi perbaikannya. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi dengan informan yang terdiri atas Prevention Supervisor Team Leader, Fire Fighting Operation Chief, dan personel pelaksana. Data dianalisis menggunakan teori controlling Robbins dan Coulter yang dioperasionalkan menjadi empat indikator, yaitu monitoring, evaluation, feedback, dan corrective action. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan telah dilakukan melalui briefing, pemantauan langsung, penilaian pelaksanaan latihan, debriefing, dan pemberian arahan perbaikan. Namun, indikator penilaian belum tersusun secara sistematis dan belum diterapkan secara konsisten, sedangkan feedback dan tindak lanjut perbaikan masih dominan disampaikan secara lisan sehingga belum terdokumentasi dengan baik. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, penelitian ini merekomendasikan checklist pengawasan wet drill berbasis Google Forms. Checklist divalidasi oleh dua validator dan memperoleh skor 95 dari 96 dengan persentase hasil validasi sebesar 98,96%. Instrumen ini diharapkan mendukung pengawasan yang lebih terstruktur, objektif, konsisten, dan terdokumentasi, meskipun belum diuji langsung di lapangan.
Kata kunci: prosedur pengawasan, wet drill, dry drill, PKP-PK, checklist, kesiapsiagaan operasional.
This study aims to analyze the supervision procedures for wet drill and dry drill activities of Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) personnel in supporting operational readiness at Yogyakarta International Airport and to formulate improvement recommendations. A qualitative case study approach was used. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation involving the Prevention Supervisor Team Leader, Fire Fighting Operation Chief, and operational personnel. The data were analyzed using Robbins and Coulter’s controlling theory, operationalized into four indicators: monitoring, evaluation, feedback, and corrective action. The results show that supervision has been conducted through briefing, direct monitoring, assessment, debriefing, and corrective directions. However, assessment indicators have not been systematically structured or consistently applied, while feedback and corrective follow-up are still mostly delivered verbally and are not well documented. Therefore, this study recommends a Google Forms-based wet drill supervision checklist covering the four indicators. The checklist was validated by two validators and obtained 95 out of 96, with a validation percentage of 98.96%. The instrument is expected to support a more structured, objective, consistent, and documented supervision process, although it has not yet been directly tested in the field.
Keywords: supervision procedures, wet drill, dry drill, ARFF, checklist, operational readiness.